Menü
Premium Account

Für schnellen Download
Suche
Kategorien
Megapack [428]
Alex-Lynn [12]
ALSScan [6]
AmourAngels [32]
avErotica [20]
Baremaidens [13]
Bloom [22]
ClubSeventeen [8]
DeNudeArt [27]
Erotic [17]
Errotica [22]
EvasGarden [62]
ExclusiveTeenPorn [39]
Graphis [22]
Hegre-Art [29]
HollyRandall [42]
Katya Clover [8]
MC-Nudes [13]
MetArt [48]
MetArtX [22]
MilenAngel [10]
MPL-Studios [57]
MyNakedDolls [37]
Photodromm [129]
RylskyArt [13]
ShowyBeauty [71]
SexArt [20]
Stunning18 [13]
TeenDreams [11]
TeenPornStorage [21]
Video - DVD 5/9 [27]
Video - Movies [1554]
Video - Movies (Full)HD [331]
Video - Transsexual [15]
Video - Clips [31]
Watch4Beauty [89]
X-Art [9]
Xiuren [4]
Zemani [28]
Other [77]
Mini- Chat
100
Kalender
Archiv der Einträge
Besucher
Flag Counter
Einloggen
Hauptseite » 2021 » Februar » 6 » Dirty Diaries -2009-
09:04
Dirty Diaries -2009-

-Click Cover for Thumbnail-

Dirty Diaries
560 x 416 Pixel - AVI - 1:37 Std. - 1080 MB

Download:
FastFile KatFile

Kategorie: Video - Movies | Aufrufe: 156 | Hinzugefügt von: Ghost45 | Bewertung: 0.0/0
Kommentare insgesamt: 1
1 Ghost45  
0
Cast: Ester Martin Bergsmark, Mia Engberg, Sara Kaaman, Pella Kagerman, Wolfe Madam, Elin Magnusson, Tora Martens, Jennifer Rainsford, Nelli Roselli, Ingrid Ryberg, Joanna Rytel, Asa Sandzen, Marit Ostberg

Studio: -
Country: Schweden
Released: 2009
Category: Cunnilingus, Oral, Toys, Fisting, Masturbation, Compilations

Video:
Codec: MP4
Länge: 1:37 Std.
Auflösung: 560*416 Pixel
Bitrate: 1408 Kbps
FPS: 25

Audio:
Codec: MP3
Sample-Rate: 48000 Hz
Bitrate: 100 Kbps

In Episoden aufgeteilt: ja

Dirty Diaries is a 2009 collection of thirteen pornographic short films made by Swedish feminists and produced by Mia Engberg. The individual films are highly diverse in content, although many of them feature humour and different forms of queer sex. The creative decisions were based on a manifesto with the aim to create pornography that is non-commercial and follows feminist ideals.
The film sparked controversy before and after its release because of sexually provocative content and the fact that it was mainly financed through public funds. Film critics were split in their reception; some found the film amusingly provocative while others thought it was dull.

Vorname *:
Email *:
Code *: